|
|
|
Tell us what you think of the site.
|
Autodesk Media & Entertainment User Community
|
Autodesk® 3ds Max®
|
|
Autodesk® Maya®
|
|
Autodesk® Softimage®
|
|
Autodesk® MotionBuilder®
|
|
Autodesk® Mudbox™
|
|
Autodesk® ImageModeler™
|
|
Autodesk® Sketchbook® Pro
|
|
Autodesk® Smoke on Mac®
|
| Material appears differently on similar oject
|
|
|
Hi,
I have two objects in my drawing. I applied on them the same material.
As result when I render, the texture looks very different from one to another.
I applied a UVW Map and it did not help.
For both, I used a cylindrical mapping as the two shapes are similar to a cylinder. The two objects are about the same size. What I don’t understand, is that the size of the cylindrical shape in UVW map menu on one is around 3 cm. And in the other shape, it is 36 cm.
I tried to put the same size, but the result in render still the same.
I tried to joint a file that would help you to understand, but I wasn’t possible
Thanks
|
|
|
|
The scene would be most useful.
It is very possible to attach a scene, but you need to read this post to see where you’re going wrong.
Max 4.2 through 2013.
XP-64 (SP2)
NVidia 9800GTX-512 (Driver 266.58).
Core 2 Quad Q6600 2.4GHz, 8Gb Ram, DX9.0c.
|
|
|
|
I read the post about attachment, and the file is correct and I did correctly.
It likes it takes too long after clicking SUBMIT and it stops in the middle of the process.
|
|
|
|
How big is the file - the actiual .zip not the scene? I just attached a zipped scene in the 2012 forum with no problems at all.
Max 4.2 through 2013.
XP-64 (SP2)
NVidia 9800GTX-512 (Driver 266.58).
Core 2 Quad Q6600 2.4GHz, 8Gb Ram, DX9.0c.
|
|
|
|
The file is only 500K.
I tried from another computer without success.
It is maybe the security at my job that does that, don t know.
I will try from home tonight
|
|
|
|
Here’s the attached file that should help to explain my problem.
| Attachment
|
|
|
|
|
|
That’s an image, not the .max scene file which was requested, though it’s quite clear that the construction of the 2 sections are entirely different. The one is a nice clean Quad mesh, then other is obviously a low poly object with a Turbosmooth on it, which may be contributing to the problem. Try moving the UVWMap below the Turbosmooth.
Max 4.2 through 2013.
XP-64 (SP2)
NVidia 9800GTX-512 (Driver 266.58).
Core 2 Quad Q6600 2.4GHz, 8Gb Ram, DX9.0c.
|
|
|
|
|
One thing I don’t understand is that whatever change I make in UVWMap it does not change anything when rendered. I made big change in UVWMap just to verify and the render stays the same.
There is not change with or without UVMMap. It should not be, no?
Author: botine
|
| Replied: 09 June 2011 03:53 AM
|
|
|
|
|
I tried to move the UVW Map below, did not change the result.
I don’t know how the objects were created, I thought they were about the same quality of polygons.
This time I attached the .max doc (of course as a zip file)
Thanks for your help!
|
|
|
|
...AND Cylinder03 has a Scale of 12.8 %, which explaines the different size of the texture.
hope it helps
|
|
|
|
|
I didn’t spot that.
That explains why the texture size is different.
Use the Reset Xform utillity on it and see how it renders.
Author: Samab
|
| Replied: 09 June 2011 04:25 AM
|
|
|
|
3d-costello 09 June 2011 11:15 AM
...AND Cylinder03 has a Scale of 12.8 %, which explaines the different size of the texture.
hope it helps
|
|
|
|
You did help me a lot, thank you.
There is one thing I still do not understand.
UVW map that do not work, do not make any change on the render. As someone recommended me, I looked at map channel, but it’s seems ok.
After making a couple of tests, it looks like it is doing that when I use a smoke map.
Thanks again, this forum is so helpful.
|
|
|
|
|
|