Inside Sabertooth
Learn how Sabertooth uses 3ds Max to create 3D interactive projects, including HBO Go’s Game of Thrones interactive experience
  • 1/3
You are here: Forum Home / Autodesk 3ds® Max® / Installation - Hardware - OS / 3dsMax 2011 or 2012 - - Boot Camp?
  RSS 2.0 ATOM  
2 pages: 1.2 last

3dsMax 2011 or 2012 - - Boot Camp?
Rate this thread
 
53883
 
Permlink of this thread  
avatar
  • phloog
  • Posted: 01 April 2011 01:01 AM
  • Total Posts: 184
  • Joined: 22 August 2006 11:30 AM

I have a primary desktop machine that serves me well, but when travelling I’ve been using a Sony Vaio for Max...this was a mistake, because Sony makes horrible hardware...after three fan issues in warranty, the machine now dies after ten minutes use (pop-black)...hmmm, wonder if it could be related to the in-warranty fan problems?

Looking at Consumer Reports, I’m having a hard time finding a good but affordable laptop for Max, but I am intrigued by the Macbook.

Is Max 2011 supported on Apple hardware using Bootcamp?  Will 2012 be supported

Thanks,
JT



Jim Todd
Coloma, MI
(home of Deer Forest!!!)

Replies: 1
/userdata/avatar/izvkazh33.png

2011 is not supported as far as I’m aware, but it works fine in BootCamp and performs well .

2012, no idea (yet) .

Author: scratch/post

Replied: 04 April 2011 05:32 AM  
avatar
  • Location: West Midlands, England, UK
  • Total Posts: 14445
  • Joined: 06 August 2007 11:06 PM
  • Permlink of this post

Yes - see this page



Max 4.2 through 2013.
XP-64 (SP2)
NVidia 9800GTX-512 (Driver 266.58).
Core 2 Quad Q6600 2.4GHz, 8Gb Ram, DX9.0c.

Replies: 0
avatar
  • phloog
  • Posted: 01 April 2011 01:35 AM

Thanks, but forgive my ignorance…

I have always THOUGHT (and even that might be wrong), that as long as I didn’t use the same license at the same time, I could keep Max on two machines. 

It LOOKS like this might require a version of 3dsmax for Mac?  Or can I use my 64bit WIN version on the Mac?

This is probably the easiest question in the world, but I’m just not getting it.



Jim Todd
Coloma, MI
(home of Deer Forest!!!)

Replies: 0
avatar
  • Location: West Midlands, England, UK
  • Total Posts: 14445
  • Joined: 06 August 2007 11:06 PM
  • Permlink of this post

There is no “mac version” - you would be running the normal windows version on a windows os which happens to be running on a mac.

Licensing is pretty easy - 1 license per copy (excluding render nodes). If you have one license and you want to use max on 2 systems you have to move the license from the one to the other - you can’t use both simultaneously/concurrently. You can install max on as many machines as you like, but can only use one of them at any one time (excluding those used as render nodes) per license.



Max 4.2 through 2013.
XP-64 (SP2)
NVidia 9800GTX-512 (Driver 266.58).
Core 2 Quad Q6600 2.4GHz, 8Gb Ram, DX9.0c.

Replies: 0
avatar
  • phloog
  • Posted: 01 April 2011 02:14 AM

Thanks again!  What threw me was that the page linked had text that said something like:

3DSMax 2011 and 3dsMax Design 2011 for Macintosh

...made it sound like a separate product.

In a way this makes my decision TOUGHER (more options)...off to Adobe to find out how it works for their stuff...then eon (Vue), then...then....ick...(this may be why people don’t switch)



Jim Todd
Coloma, MI
(home of Deer Forest!!!)

Replies: 0
avatar

I don’t know if it is still true today but in the past, you get MORE PC for the same money spent. You need to spec out the PC you need and stop getting the one “off the shelf” at a department/electronics store. As you have found from your past PC, get a Dell or HP business class machine, not a home user type.



3ds Max 9 thru 2013
Windows 7 Enterprise 64-bit OS SP1
Dual Intel® Xeon® 6 core X5650 @ 2.67GHz CPU 36GB RAM
NVIDIA Quadro 4000
450GB HDD (x3) and 2TB HDD

3ds Max 2012 Certified Professional Models to Motion

Replies: 4
/img/forum/dark/default_avatar.png

Sadly he wants a lappy :(

Author: Steve_Curley

Replied: 01 April 2011 03:23 AM  
/userdata/avatar/345m67gtb.png

I know he is “leaning” that way but I am trying to “straiten” him out… i.e. remove the temptation to go to the dark side...lol

Author: Doughboy12

Replied: 01 April 2011 03:33 AM  
/img/forum/dark/default_avatar.png

From his original post I suspect he is beyond redemption ;)

Author: Steve_Curley

Replied: 01 April 2011 04:14 AM  
/userdata/avatar/345m67gtb.png

Looks like you were correct again from his post below...he just doesn’t get it...Macs are not as good as the iPhone. There is a reason Apple “invented” the iPod and iPhone…
But to answer his question, yes it can be done. Would you get more of a “bang for your buck” to go with a PC? VERY MUCH SO, if like I said to begin with, YOU spec it out and don’t buy off the shelf.

Author: Doughboy12

Replied: 04 April 2011 04:07 AM  
avatar
  • phloog
  • Posted: 01 April 2011 10:01 AM

Sorry… I thought I was clear but I guess not....down in my office I have Gigantor - a Dell workstation chosen specifically for my 3d stuff.  But sometimes I like to fiddle with Max while my wife and I sit on the couch, her with her Nook, me with a laptop.  I don’t need the 24gig super vidcard desktop for that, and it makes it harder to cuddle with a giant tower there with us

So yes, I do want a good laptop, but it won’t be where I do most of my heavy Max work.  I need a laptop to run Max acceptably well, but I’m not going to do huge render jobs on it.

I was thinking that a Mac might be nice if it could run Max at LEAST as well as the Vaio, not that I was changing to all my work on a MacBook.

The setup would be :

Dell Huge Workstation when really working with Max
macBook of some kind for Max fiddling about



Jim Todd
Coloma, MI
(home of Deer Forest!!!)

Replies: 0
avatar

there is one thing you have to think about before getting a mac, limited choice in hardware. if you want to use any applications that use CUDA like Iray for example the only mac that even comes with an nvidia card any more is the standard macbook which is very low spec (dual core, up to 4GB 1066mhz DDR3 memory, and 5400rpm hard drive). Macbook Pro is even worse for choices, no nvidia cards at all, and also no dedicated graphics card till you spend over £1500 and then to even have a decent dedicated graphics (AMD Radeon HD 6750M with 1GB GDDR5) you have to spend over £1800. they don’t even offer mobile workstation cards so i’m not sure whats “Pro” about a macbook pro.

just some things to think about



3Ds Max 2012+Sp2 +SAP, Vray 2.2, Photoshop CS5.1
OS - Windows 7 Pro x64 Sp1
sys1: i7 2600k (OC to 4.2GHz), 16GB 1600mhz DDR3 Ram, MSI GTX 580 (3GB) (295.51), OCZ vertex 2 120GB SSD, Wacom Intuos 3
sys2: i7 2600k (OC to 4.2GHz), 16GB 1600mhz DDR3 Ram, MSI GTX 560 (1GB) (295.51), wacom bamboo

Replies: 4
/userdata/avatar/izvkazh33.png

@Companioncube,

there are some features in the MacBook Pro that do deem it to be such, hence what you’re paying additional for .

My MacBook Pro has an nvidia card and I’m glad I bought it before the refresh where Apple decided to move to AMD, somewhat of a mistake in my book . As for Mac Pro workstations, something that you would probably want to invest in for serious heavy lifting, you can pull out the AMD rubbish and put in an nvidia card instead, though admittedly the number of supported cards isn’t as high but that is simply a driver problem . There are reasons that they are preferred workstations and why applications such as Smoke are starting to appear on that platform and not on PC .

Yes, they are a *lot* more money, but if you look at it in terms of investment and how long a system like that will last you they are worth it . I’ll compound that by saying that I have a second generation iMac DV, the one with the CRT display before it started to look like it was in a collision with a wall (eMac) and the “iLamp” and it still works perfectly only that all current generation production software has now massively outgrown it . Moral of the story, if you want a system that is extremely robust and will last you for a *very* long time, a Mac is worth it .

As for Bootcamp, this is simply a partition on the Mac HDD that allows you to install Windows . It is not emulated in any way and was made possible because of the move to Intel architecture from Power PC . The only major difference is that Windows will need specific drivers for the Mac hardware, most of which Apple provides on the OSX install disc . 3dsmax runs exactly the same as it would on a normal PC box, as with anything else you wish to install . I have done so on my 13” MacBook Pro and it performs very well .

Final Cut Pro (my video editing app of choice) in OSX runs beautifully fast and robust (not a single crash in over a months constant use) .

Sadly, 3dsmax is now really the only application that shackles me to PC . I hate that .

Author: scratch/post

Replied: 04 April 2011 04:47 AM  
/userdata/avatar/345m67gtb.png

@ nirokugraphic,
My original PC, from 1982, still runs “perfectly” too, with the programs written for it (dos) what does that have to do with any argument? I don’t think it is realistic for that kind of statement to be factored in to the decision unless to say that you can pay more up front so you can’t afford to upgrade it when you should, but no worries because you like 3D Studio Max 4 better anyway...lol

Author: Doughboy12

Replied: 04 April 2011 04:56 AM  
/userdata/avatar/izvkazh33.png

@doughboy

They made them to not break down after a year or two back then unlike how they do now :) While you may not agree with that argument it is still food for thought to some degree .

3D Studio Max 4 ? Actually I liked that release and was disappointed they didn’t commit to the discreet naming scheme and didn’t call it Magma .

Author: scratch/post

Replied: 04 April 2011 05:06 AM  
/userdata/avatar/345m67gtb.png

Who would have guessed...lol

Author: Doughboy12

Replied: 04 April 2011 05:43 AM  
avatar

I didn’t know I had to specifically state that I was talking in terms of LAPTOPS, but I am...?



3ds Max 9 thru 2013
Windows 7 Enterprise 64-bit OS SP1
Dual Intel® Xeon® 6 core X5650 @ 2.67GHz CPU 36GB RAM
NVIDIA Quadro 4000
450GB HDD (x3) and 2TB HDD

3ds Max 2012 Certified Professional Models to Motion

Replies: 0
avatar
  • phloog
  • Posted: 05 April 2011 04:03 PM

Well, I didn’t really expect this to become as snide as it did at times.  I used to post a LOT more many, many years ago...are all the threads this condescending and awful, or only when someone brings up Mac/Apple? (which I guess makes this forum no different than the rest of the web).

Side remark: How exactly does being “intrigued” by the Mac make me “beyond redemption”...?  To me intrigue is interest and curiosity...did it become mindless single-minded determination when I wasn’t looking?

I apologize for misunderstanding one post, but when someone says “PC” to me, as a long time Windows platform user (due almost entirely to Max), I tend not to think PC as Windows vs. Apple, and instead PC as a workstation, and laptop as, well, a laptop. 

Having rarely in the past even considered an Apple machine, for me “PC” meant a desktop...so yes, when you come into the thread, and try to set me straight, it might have been far better to say something like “I don’t think Apple products are very good for the money.” Having said all that, I’ll grant that perhaps I’m misreading the posts here.

I own a Sony machine which is garbage.  I had a custom configured Dell laptop that lasted exactly 14 months.  Our HP MC laptop was nicknamed “Fireball”...My wife has a Toshiba that 17 months in has an(apparently known) issue where a cable is bad, so the bottom 5% of the screen is garbled.  I don’t really know if Apple is more durable, but based on my son’s MacBook Pro they sure seem well-built, and frankly if there’s any truth to the idea that they are more durable that can mean as much to me as performance, as I’m tired of laptops becoming the next inkjet printers...disposable.  And the idea of shelling out $3k or more on something that will last less than five years doesn’t appeal.



Jim Todd
Coloma, MI
(home of Deer Forest!!!)

Replies: 3
/img/forum/dark/default_avatar.png

Firstly - lighten up a bit. If you re-read those comments they are clearly tongue-in-cheek and not intended to be taken literally (note the “wink” smiley).
Secondly, Apple hardware has historically been overpriced and under powered with far too much emphasis on how “cool” they look. Maybe they are getting better, I wouldn’t know and have no intention of finding out. Their “lock in” mentality (think iTunes/iStore for their phones) doesn’t just push them down the list it removes them entirely (for me anyway). And before you throw Microsoft at me, yes - they are as bad in some ways but at least they don’t make the hardware as well.
Finally, laptops are also over priced and under powered so a double whammy when considering Apple, but if that’s what you want/need then that’s your choice - it’s your money after all - but don’t complain when folks point out the obvious pitfalls of making such a descision. You asked the question - don’t be surprised when you get answers you may not want to hear.

Author: Steve_Curley

Replied: 05 April 2011 09:59 PM  
/userdata/avatar/izvkazh33.png

I completely agree with you Jim, as a fellow Todd - forums including this one seem to be full of snide, arrogant and condescending people . We’re all in this creative field together, there is zero excuse to be anything but respectful and helpful to our peers - I expect this and I give it, knowing full well that we don’t all live in a fairy wonderland with rainbows and unicorns . Tongue and cheek has no place here to me .

The more we help each other and give, the more we grow and get back .

As for the hardware debate, stop it . People seem to be vehemently anti-Apple for little real quantifiable reason and the main argument I hear is that they’re not “open enough” . We’re visually creative people, we don’t need to spend upwards of 25% of the time dealing with hardware and driver issues, we expect our tools to work . We’re not sys-admins !

PCs are great, I’ve spent all my life around them in one form or another but I’m tired of Windows and have been *very* impressed with the hardware and software performance of Apple stuff (which immediately negates the price which is the other major down point) .

I am not about to sit here and debate and explain why a PC is better than a Mac and vice versa because ultimately it’s the same argument about whether 3dsmax is better than Maya, if Photoshop is better than Gimp etc etc . It goes on and on and has no end .

Work with what you want . It is not your, my or anyone else’s place to deride and snipe at people who want to move to and use something they will be more comfortable with . At the end of the day, it’s all about getting work done, that is *all* that matters, right ?

Author: scratch/post

Replied: 05 April 2011 10:59 PM  
/userdata/avatar/345m67gtb.png

First and foremost, “lighten up Frances.” (edit)
Second, as I said you asked about laptops, I assumed you wanted answers about LAPTOPS, how can I be at blame when you, the OP, misunderstand a reply about LAPTOPS to think because I said PC to mean WORKSTATIONS? Give me a break. If you are that sensitive about what you read on here, one thanks for NOT posting very often, and two maybe you deserve to buy an Apple.
Third, I do think Apple products ARE VERY GOOD, I have an iPhone 4 and had an iPhone 3GS…I love them. Are they overpriced? Of course they are. Do I care? NO. Does that mean I would by a MacBook? Absolutely not. I don’t mind buying an up to date pc every 2 years for half the price of a MacBook every 3 years. And before you tell me they last longer than that, I DON’T WANT MY HARDWARE THAT OLD AND SLOW.
Fourth, say what you want about your “luck” with the various laptops but I had a Dell Precision 6300 for 3 years, even dropped it twice, and put thousands of air miles on it. It is still kicking but IT felt the need to “upgrade” it and that is the only reason I don’t still have it. It was a work horse and I would recommend that or a similar platform for anyone wanting to do MAX on the road.
Side remark one: The reason the MAC vs. PC argument is so violent is because PC people are jealous and can’t afford or don’t want to spend that much on their hardware…lol If you have the money to spend by all means, go get the Mac. (That way you can look cool at the coffee shop too. Ok that part is unfair, but is one of the reasons to get one…IMHO)
Side remark: I too thought you were not past the point of no return, hence my first response to your question, that you and others took to mean I was talking about WORKSTATIONS…your bad.
Now back to our regularly scheduled programing…for some that is literal.

Author: Doughboy12

Replied: 06 April 2011 01:49 AM  
avatar
  • phloog
  • Posted: 06 April 2011 08:28 AM

Steve...ok, tongue and cheek it is from you.  My apologies, but coming on the tails of someone who thinks that putting “lol” at the end excuses all it struck me as not so tongue and cheek...no problem.

The proper quote, I believe, is “lighten up, Frances”, but got it...the odds of this thread adding any value going forward are slim, other than making me realize that some times it’s best to just ignore some folks.



Jim Todd
Coloma, MI
(home of Deer Forest!!!)

Replies: 1
/userdata/avatar/345m67gtb.png

The “lol” wasn’t meant to “excuse all.” it was in reference to the “dark side” part...as in I was joking about it being the dark side. I guess you came here with one question (does Mac run on a Mac?) and ended up defending why you wanted to get a Mac. Sorry you think we all should all agree with you but most people take budget into account when making a purchase of this size. If you can’t understand that or don’t want to, don’t make me out to be the bad guy. After all most of this started when you went into your rant about a PC implying a workstation.
Have fun with your new portable Mac, and I am sure it will compute light year around anything I can afford.

Author: Doughboy12

Replied: 06 April 2011 09:46 AM  
2 pages: 1.2 last