|
Tell us what you think of the site.
|
Autodesk Media & Entertainment User Community
|
Autodesk® 3ds Max®
|
|
Autodesk® Maya®
|
|
Autodesk® Softimage®
|
|
Autodesk® MotionBuilder®
|
|
Autodesk® Mudbox™
|
|
Autodesk® ImageModeler™
|
|
Autodesk® Sketchbook® Pro
|
|
Autodesk® Smoke on Mac®
|
| how should I model a surface - think pond or even road - within a larger mesh?
|
|
|
I have a mesh and a number of splines representing different landscape features.
I’m wondering what is the right way to go about making these elements visible. I’m new to max and I’m not sure whether they should be textured or decal’ed on, or if they should be spliced from the base mesh or even added atop it. I plan on using vray and I know that there are problems with coplanar faces rendering properly. if anyone has any quick pointers off the top of their head, I would really appreciate it!
thanks
|
|
|
|
splines have a render setting to make them visibile during a render. just turn it on
|
|
|
|
well actually I am looking to render them as surfaces, and the question is do I split them out from a base surface or use textures to differentiate between inside and outside the spline?
|
|
|
|
For large areas, you’ll end up needing some pretty high resolution mask images if you want to mask where the road/pond occurs. But, you can also do some nice fades from one material to the next, and avoid the harsh change from grass to water.
Using something like Shapemerge (Create - Compound Objects) to create a different piece of geometry is sometimes a little easier. You have more control over where the pond-road sits, and the materials you use will be a lot less complex.
To avoid coplanar faces, either cut the new geometry for the road pond out of the terrain, or extrude it slightly above the existing geometry.
3DS Max Design 2011 64-bit - Advantage Pack
Dell Precision T5500, Dual Six Core Xeon X5650 @ 2.67GHz, nVidia Quadro 5000, 24 GB RAM, Win 7 Enterprise 64-bit
Minneapolis, MN, USA
|
|
|
|
|
yeah, I’m thinking I’m going to actually make it geometric and do some splitting. do I need to worry about light leaks between edges that were once welded together?
and should I detach one mesh from the other once they are split? maybe this is just a matter of preference one way or another…
and...thought I think will avoid this by eliminating transparency from the equation - what happens when you split the face of a volume and make the material transparent- do you see all the way through it? or the interior of the volume...or?
thanks so much for the reply…
Author: oompa_l
|
| Replied: 20 July 2009 06:23 AM
|
|
|
|
|
Light leaks shouldn’t be an issue as long as you stay on top of your terrain. Unless you’re rendering the inside of a Hobbit hole and there’s a road cut out over the top. :)
If you split mesh and don’t detach the geometry, then you’ll need to use a Multi Sub-Object material. Otherwise, you can use separate materials for each object. You’re correct, this is more personal preference whether you want to detach or not.
I’m not sure what you’re asking regarding the transparency and a split volume.
3DS Max Design 2011 64-bit - Advantage Pack
Dell Precision T5500, Dual Six Core Xeon X5650 @ 2.67GHz, nVidia Quadro 5000, 24 GB RAM, Win 7 Enterprise 64-bit
Minneapolis, MN, USA
|
|
|
|
oh, I just meant that a few of these “features” are water elements which could in theory be transparent - if I were not to give them bottoms and just made them surfaces with textures that had transparency I was curious what would happen. But i’ll probably avoid the transparency so no big deal.
thanks so much for the advice.
|
|
|
|
The problem now is doing the actual splitting. I have tried both vanillA and pro versions and they rarely produce results. Any advice?
|
|
|
|
Vanilla and Pro what? Run us through what you’re doing, where it fails, and maybe a screen shot or two to illustrate.
3DS Max Design 2011 64-bit - Advantage Pack
Dell Precision T5500, Dual Six Core Xeon X5650 @ 2.67GHz, nVidia Quadro 5000, 24 GB RAM, Win 7 Enterprise 64-bit
Minneapolis, MN, USA
|
|
|
|
boolean is the operative word I neglected to mention. I don’t have my work in front of me but I’ll try to send stuff when I do. I was hoping there was maybe another option that I had overlooked.
I also did a little research on why my booleans did not work and the most promising answer seems to be that they weren’t solids. I’ll work on that but there were problems making them solids too. I’m just coming from Rhino where modeling is primarily about surfaces and you can project trim and split very easily, using surfaces and curves alone.
about my making my surface a solid - the surface is a very irregular triangulated mesh - and my instinct was to take its open edges and loft them to a flattened version of the same curve. It didn’t even come close to working and I moved on to try to extrude these curves and then slice through them with a plane...This worked mostly except a few planes having not been split were deleted with the extras and left me with holes that I wasn’t sure how to close.
Anyway, to make a long story short I think Im having trouble making booleans go because I don’t have proper solids to begin with...and I am not sure how to make them. if you could tell me how to go about this - I would be really grateful
thanks!
|
|
|
|
Sorry, I wasn’t thinking Boolean since it hadn’t been mentioned in the thread.
Stop where you are and rethink using Booleans. As you’ve already found, they are largely unreliable when dealing with complex geometry. Even though PreBooleans are much improved, they still have their shortcomings. Booleans should really be a last resort. And used with caution! :)
Here’s an idea for a pond: Draw a spline in the outline of your pond shape. Raise it above your terrain mesh. Shapemerge the pond line with the terrain. Convert to Editable Poly, select the faces inside the pond shape, and do a negative extrude for depth. [edit] You may want to first make the edges of the pond planar, so your water doesn’t spill out! [/edit] Then either extrude the original spline slightly and place over top of the pond, or, if you want the volume of the water, detach a copy of the terrain pond bottom, flip the normals and cap it. You will have to raise the water slightly above or below the pond bottom to avoid coplanar faces.
3DS Max Design 2011 64-bit - Advantage Pack
Dell Precision T5500, Dual Six Core Xeon X5650 @ 2.67GHz, nVidia Quadro 5000, 24 GB RAM, Win 7 Enterprise 64-bit
Minneapolis, MN, USA
|
|
|
|
|
Chris, I need to continue this conversation - two issues:
first - sometimes my poly’s after being converted from meshes don’t look very good - the surfaces doesn’t match up cleanly with the border - is this ok?
second - is there a way to extrude/shell/whatever in a purely z direction, and not a normal to the surface?
thanks!
Author: oompa_l
|
| Replied: 21 November 2009 08:55 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oompa_!, it would help to see a screen shot of the problems you are running into with your first issue.
For the second issue, yes, you probably can do it strictly in a z-direction, but it depends on what you are extruding and how you are extruding it. In a subobject face, you can try doing a very small extrusion then dragging the new faces up. But a screen grab might help.
Since your original thread is a little old, it may be better to start a new one and explain where you’re at now with your model.
Author: Chris Medeck
|
| Replied: 23 November 2009 03:40 AM
|
|
|
|
|
looking into shapemerge i seems like what I’ve been looking for all along. the boolean stuff drove me absolutely crazy and I wasted a ton of time trying to make it work. still without my compu in front of me, the shapemerge sounds bout right
as for the making solids problem, do you have any advice on that front . I have a triangular mesh with an open edge with many vertices. My thoughts were to flattena second version of the curve and loft the two together...is there a better max way to do this that I don’t know about?
thanks so much!
|
|
|
|
| Settings
| Choose Theme color:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|