AREA forums upgrade
Read more about the planned upgrade of our forums
  • 1/3
You are here: Forum Home / Autodesk® Flame®, Flame® Premium / General Discussion / no 2012 user-guide as pdf anymore?
IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT ABOUT AREA FORUMS
  RSS 2.0 ATOM  
2 pages: 1.2 last

no 2012 user-guide as pdf anymore?
Rate this thread
 
54728
 
Permlink of this thread  
avatar
  • toodee
  • Posted: 19 April 2011 06:54 AM
  • Total Posts: 2
  • Joined: 15 March 2011 01:08 PM

Is there really no PDF for the user-guide and the release notes and the known bugs anymore?

The wiki looks like crap and gives me many error codes - I guess Firefox 4 has some display problems or the database doesn’t work…

What is so bad to hand out a well structured pdf?
Where you can easily find some reference information?

Please!

Daniel



Replies: 1
/userdata/avatar/776mu52u2.png

http://images.autodesk.com/adsk/files/flame_help_2012_linux.tar.gz

It was well complained about… HTML is the new PDF.  You can download a local install HTML help with the link above.

Author: Brian Mulligan

Replied: 19 April 2011 08:02 AM  
avatar
  • kandis
  • Posted: 20 April 2011 01:44 AM

Hi Daniel,

I am sorry to hear you are having problems with the wiki.

What kind of error codes are you getting? FF is supported; we use that almost exclusively internally.

As far as the look of it, what are finding problematic?

Thanks,
Kandis



Replies: 0
avatar
  • daquake
  • Posted: 20 April 2011 12:12 PM

I’ll miss the pdf option.  Always had it up and searches found what I wanted right away.  The new wiki site is quite sluggish and its not nearly as convenient as the pdf would have been.
I’m all for trying new things and I’m intrigued with the wiki site… but the pdf manual should have stayed as an option.  It will be missed.

James



Replies: 1
/img/forum/light/default_avatar.png

Hi James,

Thanks for your feedback.

I’m curious about your experience with the search. What is the issue you are having with it? We believe the search should be better than PDF, so I am curious as to why you are not having that experience.

I agree with you about the performance. It’s not really where we want it. But work is ongoing to improve it.

I hope you will keep sticking with the wiki. This is just the beginning and we hope to continue to improve on the experience.

Thanks
Kandis
Creative Finishing doc lead

Author: kandis

Replied: 21 April 2011 12:20 AM  
avatar

Not against trying the wiki, but is there any way peeps have figured out to load onto an ipad?  I work at a bunch of facilities and i’ve found having the manuals on the ipad to be an indispensible resource.

Cheers-
Andy D.



Replies: 2
/userdata/avatar/qrt23q3x2_LJpic.jpeg

Agreed!  Regularly use(d) the pdf on my iPad via Goodreader.

Author: daquake

Replied: 22 April 2011 07:38 AM  
/img/forum/light/default_avatar.png

Are you talking about having offline access to the wiki on your ipad? The wiki itself runs on portable devices. I view it with my iTouch! Waiting for my ipad. Others in the office view it on their ipad, wireless or 3G, no problem.

Author: kandis

Replied: 26 April 2011 12:28 AM  
avatar
  • Jeepers
  • Posted: 22 April 2011 09:51 AM

I’m sorry to say, I really do not like the Wiki html format.  PDF was far better.  I miss being able to mousewheel scroll through pages quickly, I miss the visual look, I miss the speed, and I miss the more plentiful graphics/screenshots. 

I am actually going to continue to use the 2011 PDF file and only resort to this wiki when it’s something that is 2012 specific. Not a good sign…

I think this was a step backwards, at least when it comes to the interface.  There should at least be a PDF file available as an option.



Replies: 0
avatar

agreed having a PDF manual has so many advantages, seems strange not to offer both.



Replies: 0
avatar
  • Jeepers
  • Posted: 25 April 2011 08:41 AM

Autodesk?  Can we get a PDF file as an option at least? 

I’ve been on the box since 1996 and up until now the documentation was always at least progressing in the right direction, 2011 being the best yet.  Hate to see it become a frustrating and less useful tool…



Replies: 1
/img/forum/light/default_avatar.png

Hi Jeepers,

Our hope is that the wiki will become a more useful tool than the PDF, which is why we went this direction.

I hear your frustration, and the frustration of others, that we have not quite hit the right solution (for online/offline viewing).

We take your feedback seriously and are working on a solution.

Feel free to contact me offline if you want to discuss. kandis DOT weiner at Autodesk Dot com

Thanks for your patience.
Kandis
Creative Finishing doc lead

Author: kandis

Replied: 26 April 2011 01:05 AM  
avatar
  • dcmfx
  • Posted: 27 April 2011 06:27 AM

I too was disappointed in seeing a wiki help manual, instead of the old reliable easy to search and view pdf file.  Hopefully you will bring that back!



Replies: 0
avatar

Ok.  Another useful thing that I can’t seem to find in the wiki, is a simple chart of all the hotkeys, both flame and smoke.
Sometimes I’d rather browse the hotkey ref than search a wiki.
Any insight?

Thx.
Andy D.



Replies: 0
avatar
  • bryank
  • Posted: 02 May 2011 02:57 AM

Hi Andy,

For hotkeys, within Smoke or Flame, you can get the most up-to-date information in the Hotkey Editor. Press Ctrl+Alt+F8.
What is nice about this method, is that depending on which module you access the Hotkey Editor from, you’ll see the different local, shared, and global hotkeys specific to that module in the Hotkey Catalogue list (it is also searchable).

Thanks, Bryan
Flame/Smoke Doc Team



Replies: 0
avatar
  • Jeepers
  • Posted: 02 May 2011 06:20 AM

I recently finally sat down with the hot key editor & scrolled through one by one—I actually learned a whole lot from it & am faster now.  The interface is a little frustrating though—such as trying to ‘sort’ by hotkey name or function doesn’t work the way you would expect.  Still, glad to have it, thanks



Replies: 0
2 pages: 1.2 last