- Showcase
- Training
- Downloads
- Blogs
General
Autodesk 3ds Max
- Maxed Out
- Taking it to the Max!
- Louis Marcoux Blog
- The 3ds Max SDK Blog
- With Design in Mind
- Max Station
- Max Nation
- 3ds Max & Moritz
- maxTD
Autodesk Softimage
Autodesk Maya
Autodesk Mudbox
Creative Finishing
- Forums
- inHouse
- Careers
- Products
Product Communities
- Events
- Gameware
Feedback
|
Tell us what you think of the site. |
| Send Feedback |
Latest Blogs
|
|
|
Software Trials
|
Autodesk® 3ds Max®
|
|
Autodesk® Maya®
|
|
Autodesk® Softimage®
|
|
Autodesk® MotionBuilder®
|
|
Autodesk® Mudbox™
|
|
Autodesk® Sketchbook® Pro
|
|
Autodesk® Smoke on Mac®
|
| RSS 2.0 | 
| ATOM |
| MR 3.5 FG Diagnosing |
| Rate this thread |
 | Permlink of this thread |
 
|
|
|
|
I am using Maya 8.5 and MR 3.5, After doing some training and tutorials and I am just wondering how you interpret the diagnosics in FG. Like, what am i looking for to say that is good, that is bad? they say and even distribution of points, no red ones, etc..but thats kind of subjective. I wish there were images that could show examples of good diagnose results and bad ones, just to get some frame of reference. I attached some tests i did in the link below. i am using just one FG casting plane only with settings in the image. can anyone give me some more specific guidelines or know of ref images? is it better to start with adj accuracy first and then min/max or vice versa?
Also is it true the 10 to 1 ratio for min/max samples is not needed anymore in 3.5? thanks! | ||||
|
