Call for Submission
NAB 2012 Best of the Best Show Reel
Submit your work today!
  • 1/3
You are here: Forum Home / Autodesk® Mudbox™ / Community Help / Capability questions
  RSS 2.0 ATOM  

Capability questions
Rate this thread
 
36915
 
Permlink of this thread   Subscribe to this thread
avatar
  • Maya Guru
  • Posted: 20 November 2009 02:27 AM
  • Location: New Delhi
  • Total Posts: 367
  • Joined: 03 June 2008 04:58 PM

Hi,

Is this Mudbox 2010 is capable of solving each and every data well i am talking on inorganic stuff
its very frustrating that it has not the features of radial symmetry like that of Z-brush.

I was trying to make a chariot which is having lots of details and i needs to carved so many things
which should be in accurate and easy and fast it should come
no doubt Mudbox is a good package of fast workflow for modeling but not easy like that of Z-brush
i mean for complex things Z-brush is very fast and capable of solving complicated sculpts
The mud on the other hand is doing things in a odd and difficult way.

So my question is For a person on project which package he should opt for sculpting
Z-brush or Mudbox
pls be honest in giving urs views.



MAYA My love

Replies: 0
avatar
  • oglu
  • Posted: 20 November 2009 03:04 AM

both as the most of us… :D



Replies: 0
avatar
  • tonytrout
  • Posted: 20 November 2009 03:21 AM

They both have their flaws and strengths, like oglu says learn both



Replies: 0
avatar
  • Maya Guru
  • Posted: 20 November 2009 06:50 AM

Well any how thanks for sharing urs view with me .

the decision is i needs to learn both but my first preference is z-brush and then Mudbox.



MAYA My love

Replies: 0




   
  Settings Choose Theme color: