|
[B]Mathworld[/B]’s definition of a polygon: ‘ A closed plane figure with sides.’
[B]From The Free Dictionary[/B]: ‘a geometrical figure with three or more sides and angles’
[B]Answers.com:[/B] ‘an [I]n[/I]-sided polygon, called an [I]n[/I]-gon, has [I]n[/I] vertices and [I]n[/I] angles. In particular, if [I]n[/I] is 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, or 12, the polygon is called a triangle (3), quadrangle (4) [or quadrilateral, meaning four sides], pentagon (5), hexagon (6), heptagon (7), octagon (8), decagon (10), or dodecagon (12)’
[B]Mathleague.com: [/B]’ A polygon is a closed figure made by joining line segments, where each line segment intersects exactly two others’.
Definitions of N-Gon:
[B]mathleague.com[/B]: ‘A polygon with n sides. For instance, a quadrilateral is a 4-gon’.
[B]wikipedia:[/B] ‘A generalized [I]n[/I]-gon ([I]n[/I] is a natural number greater than one) is an incidence structure ([I]P[/I],[I]L[/I],[I]I[/I]), where [I]P[/I] is the set of points, [I]L[/I] is the set of lines and is the incidence relation, satisfying certain regularity conditions. In order to express them, consider the bipartite [I]incidence graph[/I] with the vertex set [I]P[/I] ∪ [I]L[/I] and the edges connecting the incident pairs of points and lines’
That was pretty much all the mathematical definition of Ngon I could find. The rest referred mostly to Vietnames restaurants. There is very little evidence on the internet of Ngon being used to describe polygons in the way they are here. It seems to be peculiarly a CG thing. Although with the kind of people we see in CG these days I should hardly be surprised.
the dictionary never is what defines a word…
Yes it is. That’s what dictionaries are for. If a few decide to use words incorrectly they’re wrong, not the dictionary. You’re saying that if I decide to start calling a cat an elephant then the cat must then be an elephant. It’s not and it never will be. Furthermore, if I did choose to use the wrong name and warned you that you were being charged upon by a cat, some chaos might result and you might be displeased. This is even more true when you use the wrong definitions in math. In fact if you want to see what shoddy use of definitions in maths can do, check out the polygon count thread on this very site.
Since 3 or 4 hardly qualifies as “many”
read my post; ‘ ‘n’, in mathematics, is used by convention to denote an arbitrary number’ I didn’t say ‘many’.
|